Contract Pricing · June 2026 · 9 min read

How to Price Warehouse Start-Up Costs: Mobilisation, Ramp-Up and Amortisation

Most 3PL tenders price the steady state well and the first ninety days badly. The project team, the early-start manager, the recruitment campaign, the half-speed picking team in week two — these costs are real, they land before the first invoice goes out, and they are routinely guessed as a single lump sum or forgotten entirely. Here is how to build them up properly.

Why start-up costs get mispriced

A warehouse contract has two cost phases. The steady state — rent, labour, equipment, overheads — is what most of the pricing effort goes into. The mobilisation phase is everything it takes to get there: hiring and inducting a team, standing up the site, running the project, and absorbing the productivity dip while a new workforce learns the operation.

The steady state is priced from volumes and productivity rates. Mobilisation is priced from a staffing plan — who is involved, for how many weeks, at what weekly cost. When that plan is replaced by a single "implementation fee" guess, two things happen: the number is indefensible when the customer challenges it, and the items that scale with the deal (recruitment scales with headcount, ramp-up scales with team size) don't move when the deal changes.

The five kinds of start-up cost

Almost every line in a warehouse mobilisation budget falls into one of five categories:

Recruitment: calculate it, don't guess it

Recruitment cost is a function of the team you are hiring — which the steady-state model has already worked out. A defensible build-up:

Recruitment Cost Recruitment = (operational headcount × cost per hire)
             + (number of roles × advertising per role)

Cost per hire covers the per-person items (pre-employment medical around $350, police check around $40). Advertising is per role, not per person — one ad fills three picker positions. On a site with roughly 15.7 operational heads across 32 distinct roles, that is 15.7 × $391 + 32 × $300 ≈ $15,742. When the deal grows to two shifts, the number recalculates instead of staying frozen at the original guess.

Ramp-up: the cost nobody itemises

A new warehouse team does not pick at full rate in week one. Industry experience says a new operation starts somewhere between 60% and 80% of standard productivity and climbs to full speed over four to ten weeks, depending on the complexity of the operation. During that climb you are paying full wages for partial output — and the gap has to be covered with extra labour, typically casuals.

The extra labour cost of a straight-line ramp has a clean closed form:

Ramp-Up Cost (per activity team) Ramp-Up = team FTE × casual weekly rate × (1 − starting productivity) × weeks ÷ 2
Worked Example — Picking Team

A 6-FTE picking team starts at 70% productivity and reaches full speed over 6 weeks. Casual cover costs $1,400 per week.

Ramp-up = 6 × $1,400 × 0.30 × 6 ÷ 2 = $7,560

Receiving might start at 80% (simpler work), despatch at 60% — each activity group carries its own curve, so the total reflects the actual mix of work on the site.

Where ramp-up belongs: ramp-up is not really a start-up cost — it is front-loaded operational cost. It should land in the first two or three months of the customer's monthly budget (where the extra casuals are actually rostered), not be buried in the implementation fee. Booked that way, the monthly P&L tells the true story of the contract's first quarter and the start-up section stays clean.

A worked mobilisation budget

A mid-size site, six-week run-up, single shift:

LineBasisCost
Project Manager$975/wk × 6 weeks$5,850
Layout & Solutions Designer$900/wk × 3 weeks$2,700
HR & Recruitment Lead$700/wk × 4 weeks$2,800
Site Manager early startsalary ÷ 52 × 4 weeks$11,594
Supervisor early startsalary ÷ 52 × 3 weeks$5,259
Recruitment (calculated)15.7 heads × $391 + 32 roles × $300$15,742
Project team travel & accommodation$700 × 10 trips$7,000
Start-up total$50,945
Productivity ramp-up (memo)per activity group, months 1–3 of the operating budget$9,590

Every line traces to a rate, a duration and a quantity. When the customer asks what the implementation fee covers, the answer is a table, not a shrug.

Amortised or upfront? Both — per line

The last decision is how the customer pays. There are two honest options, and the right answer is often different line by line:

Amortised Annual Charge Annual = line cost × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)−N)
where r = financing rate, N = contract term in years

Amortising the $11,594 site manager early-start over a 3-year term at 8.5% gives $11,594 × 0.3915 ≈ $4,539 per year — $13,618 over the term, of which roughly $2,024 is the financing cost of waiting three years for the money. Quoting $11,594 ÷ 3 = $3,865 per year is quietly giving the customer an interest-free loan.

Renewals: don't re-charge mobilisation

A continuing site being renewed does not get re-mobilised — the team exists, the racking is up, productivity is at standard. A renewal should carry near-zero start-up and no ramp-up on existing sites. But a new site added during a renewal genuinely needs the full treatment: project team, recruitment, ramp-up, all of it. Pricing both correctly in the same contract is exactly the kind of detail that separates a defensible quote from a copy-paste one.

The principle

Start-up pricing is a staffing plan with rates attached, not a round number. Build it from the five categories, calculate what can be calculated, put ramp-up in the months where it really lands, and charge a financing cost when you spread payment over the term. The first ninety days stop being a margin lottery.

Mobilisation priced line by line, automatically

Purpose-built for Australian 3PL operators — auditable costing from volumes to rate card.

Book a Free Demo

Related Articles

Contract Pricing
How to Price a 3PL Contract
FTE Calculation
How to Calculate Warehouse FTE from Volume
Contract Renewal
Pricing a 3PL Contract Renewal from Actual Volumes