Four jobs, all of them yours today.
Not a roadmap. These are working features inside the platform.
She reads the tender so you don't have to.
Drop in the customer's RFP — PDF, Word, Excel or CSV — and Margo pulls out the operating numbers that drive your cost model: pallets in and out, orders and lines by channel, cartons packed, containers received, storage on hand, SKU counts, cycle counts. She fills a draft quote with them.
She also notices the things around the edges: who the customer is, the site size, the start date, the contract term, whether dangerous goods or temperature control are mentioned, and the tender's own reference number. Start a brand-new quote from a document and those details fill the form for you.
Every figure arrives with a confidence band and a citation.
Stated plainly in the document. Pre-ticked, ready to apply — with the sentence it came from shown beside it.
Implied, converted or assembled from more than one line. Left unticked on purpose, so a human makes the call.
Dropped entirely. A blank you can see beats a guess you can't. Nothing is invented to fill a gap.
You review, tick, and apply. Applying is an ordinary edit — it lands in the change log, triggers a full recalculation, and obeys every permission and lock the platform already enforces.
Ask her anything about your own numbers.
Margo sits in a drawer on every screen. Ask "why is this quote's margin lower than the last one?", "which contracts are running over budget?", "what's driving the labour cost on this site?" — and she goes and reads the actual pages to answer.
She can open your rate card, annual budget, wages and labour build, ABC allocation, fixed costs, storage, volumes, financial returns, start-up costs and budget-versus-actual — plus a portfolio view that sweeps every contract at once. Her answer names the screen each figure came from, so you can go and check her.
She notices margin leaving before you do.
Margin rarely disappears in one dramatic hit. It goes a percent at a time — a shift that never quite came back down, a volume mix that shifted, a pick rate that slipped after a system change. By the time it shows up in a year-end review it has been happening for eight months.
Once a live contract is receiving actuals, Margo compares what's really happening against the plan that was signed, month by month, and speaks up when the gap is both persistent and material. Not noise. Not a red light every month.
She learns what your warehouses really do.
Every cost model starts on industry productivity assumptions — cartons per hour, pallets put away per hour, lines picked per hour. They get you moving. They are almost never exactly what your site achieves.
Margo measures the difference from your own actuals and proposes a corrected rate for that specific warehouse. She only speaks when there's enough history to mean something and the gap is big enough to matter — and you tick which corrections to accept.
